BPL Summer Reading

16 Jun 2025 07:53 pm
redbird: closeup of me drinking tea, in a friend's kitchen (Default)
[personal profile] redbird
This year, they're giving away tote bags when people come in to get the printed bingo card. I got email on Friday saying the bags had arrived, so I went back to the Honan-Allston branch library this afternoon.

The bags are just like last year's, except printed in green instead of blue. I like last year's bag--it's the right size for me, and reasonably sturdy. I went to Lizzy's afterwards, bought pints, and put my insulated bag inside the library bag.

The prize for a bingo on the summer reading card is a sticker. I just printed a copy of the "more reading" bingo card, on which all the squares are for reading different kinds of books, and am filling in squares on both cards. So far, I haven't read anything that works for both bingo cards.
musesfool: !!!! from Middleman (!!!!)
[personal profile] musesfool
I swear, sometimes I think my oven is some kind of black hole or something, because sometimes the laws of physics seem to weirdly not apply. Yesterday, as planned, I made teriyaki meatballs. Because I don't understand how the recipe author got 28 meatballs out of 16 oz of ground meat, I had 32 oz of ground chicken, from which I made 28 ping pong ball sized meatballs. I baked 16 meatballs on one tray at 400°F for 20 minutes. It was the only tray in the oven. FOURTEEN out of the 16 were at least at 170°F when I took them out of the oven (generally I aim for 165° for fully cooked ground chicken) and checked with my instant read thermometer. TWO were at 143°F. They weren't even next to each other! Just 2 random meatballs that somehow didn't cook to the same temperature as EVERY OTHER meatball on the same tray in the same oven. I mean, I know ovens can have hot spots, so does my oven somehow have cool spots? Less hot spots? I mean, what the actual fuck???

*
[syndicated profile] notalwaysworking_feed

Posted by Not Always Right

Read Some People Process Trauma By Reliving It

Customer: *To the clerk, as he puts down a box.* "Good day, sir, there is this appliance that I bought here that refuses to perform the function it should. If I could bother you to potentially process a replacement?"
Clerk: "Sir, I'm very sorry to inform you, but this is not the proper way to communicate your problem to a store clerk."

Read Some People Process Trauma By Reliving It

cimorene: abstract painting in blue and gold and black (cloudy)
[personal profile] cimorene posting in [community profile] agonyaunt
Dear Eric: My best friend of more than 35 years is waffling over attending my son's wedding. Her excuses for not coming are an as-yet-unplanned hiking trip in Europe (it would be her fourth in less than two years), and work, which she can easily get out of. This is my only child that will ever get married, and the wedding is in her former hometown where she still has family and friends. It's one easy flight. This friend stays with us three to four times a year for several weeks when she has work in town. My husband and I were allowed to invite four couples. Even my siblings aren't invited!

I'm incredibly hurt that she's even considering not coming. To me this has already caused a shift in my feelings toward her. I haven't spoken to her about it yet but intend to. Are my feelings unreasonable?

– Mother of the Groom Gloom

Read more... )
[syndicated profile] smartbitches_feed

Posted by SB Sarah

A yellow diamond road sign says WTF? Recently Amanda and I did a Weedy AMA where we answered questions from the Podcast Patreon for a bonus episode – one that starts out pretty cogent and then derails a fair bit as I lose my train of thought.

One of the questions asked, to paraphrase, has online critique softened over the years, and why?

My answer was: Yes. Because safety.

Blogs used to be little micro-communities, and somewhat insulated from the larger internet, and especially from griefing trolls. That hasn’t been true for at least a decade, but it’s even worse now that there are seemingly legions of hobbyists who love to dox individuals whose opinions they don’t like, and engage in a campaign of harassment and misery over said opinion. It’s even more acute now that entire platforms have been given over to these fuckos, and the rhetoric of hate and divide has escalated to violence and assassination.

It’s trendy to attack someone and endanger them because their opinion is unacceptable. This happens on a large and small scale, and I know you have seen it. There are certain people who decide that other human beings aren’t people, or perhaps get so angry they forget. Consideration of humanity is optional, or altogether discouraged.

I started After Dark, in fact, partly to give you a place to comment where your comment, and your username, weren’t as easily accessed. I don’t want to stifle conversation but I recognize that being on the internet and having an opinion can bring on a world of hurt if some rando takes issue. Said randos don’t see their opposition as humans; they are targets to be destroyed.

Critique, as I said in the episode, isn’t softened because we’re all being nicer or whatever. Critique is softened (or not published at all) because I don’t want to deal with unhinged, poorly behaved fans, and especially when those unhinged, poorly behaved fans are weaponized as a collective. It sucks to moderate the comments on a post that’s reached a wider circle than usual, but that’s the job. I take the safety of the comments section very seriously because I, out here using my real name like a giant dumbass, know how dangerous, actually factually real-life dangerous, it can be. I want this to be a safe place to express your opinion.

So, let’s talk about Ali Hazelwood, who was allegedly bullied off Instagram because she preferred one Hunger Games character, and apparently picked the wrong one?

No, seriously. That’s what happened today.

Show Spoiler

Cary Elwes in Robin Hood Men in Tights with a what the fuck look on his face.

If I’m tracing this fuckery correctly, 8 days ago, a user, allegedly a karma farmer, posted to r/HungerGames a clip of a panel wherein Ali calls Peeta “useless.” Which is clearly in context a hyperbolic joke meant for the audience of that panel? Yet even the comments on that post on Reddit seem to take her opinion so personally.

Hazelwood had, per the last crawl of a search engine because her IG page is in fact gone, nearly 600,000 followers, and she was pretty active, too. Allegedly her comments about Peeta caused such Intense Rage, the number of cruel comments and DMs caused her to nuke her account.

From what I’ve been reading, this situation seems to be a two-pronged problem.

Prong the First (not to be confused with Prong the Elder, or Prong the Haberdasher): Instagram has a shitty user interface.

Susan Lee says For those worried…..Ali is fine. :) She's just technology inept and didn't know how to disable comments. So she did the only other option, delete it all. Ha! Girl is at home, on deadline (more books!), playing with her cats & raccoons. She's good. But still...some of ya'll are RUDE and frankly don't deserve books or good things. You need to CHECK YOURSELVES. And most importantly No Kings, F*CK ICE , WE THE PEOPLE (just throwing that in there because there are PRIORITIES we need to keep at the forefront)

Per Susan Lee on Threads, Hazelwood is fine, couldn’t figure out how to disable comments, so deleted the account.

Girl. I can relate. Instagram defies my attempts to use it, too.

Prong the Second: Some people are being really shitty, and it’s a continuation of a growing problem in behavior choices, emotional regulation, and access.

There’s a straight downward slope of a line between a person unleashing vitriol over an author expressing preference for a character (again: ??!?!?!?!!!) and doorstepping someone to scream at or kill them. Harassment online can lead to additional acts of violence. I’m not kidding, and I don’t think I’m exaggerating, either. The link between online harassment and offline violence is real, and being studied:

What’s most infuriating is that this behavior is from people who read a book in 2008 and take that book so personally that they decided to attack Ali Hazelwood about comments she made on a panel with other authors in a discussion that was meant to be tongue-in-cheek and entertaining for the people in the room.

But the behavior choices and lack of emotional regulation are alarming.

This isn’t neckbearded trolls with compromised assessments of their own position in the world.

This is us. This is allegedly book fandoms.

Stop it.

This situation, which is simultaneously scary and harmful, and deeply fucking unhinged and asinine, is a combination of a number of negative factors, each of which could be a whole essay.

  • There’s the intense one-sided relationships some fans have with authors, with books, or with characters (or all three).
  • There’s the flattening of an author (who is, in fact, usually a person, AI notwithstanding) into not being a person, but being an idea or a figure to be railed at or against.
  • There’s the expectation that an author will connect with readers as part of their job, and will cultivate that connection on social media.
  • There’s the social expectation of performing moral and ethical correctness especially online. Whether or not actual behavior is moral and ethical or correct is irrelevant. The point is the performance of correctness: like the correct people, like the correct things, etc.
  • There’s the unleashed and encouraged rage that has led to real life violence that frequently starts online.
  • There’s the knowledge that stating an opinion publicly might mean someone tries to harm, embarrass, or kill you.

Now, I have unleashed many a rageful opinion (I have many! Ask me about influencer children, mommy blogging, and child endangerment and exploitation) and I have most definitely hurt someone’s feelings with my opinion about a book or the genre or anything. But as I’ve said many times, the book and the author are very separate things. I see miles of distance between the book and the person. I’m talking about a book most of the time. It doesn’t have feelings.

For example, I don’t like Ali Hazelwood’s books. I’ve tried several. They are not my thing.

But to some readers, I’ve just written down some treasonous statements worthy of many, many angry email messages and social media DMs. Y’all, my inbox is a busy place, so please get in line. Your email will be deleted in the order in which it was received.

Apparently at this point in the timeline, readers with feelings about book characters felt that hurling rage and hatred about Peeta (PEETA) was and is acceptable behavior?

Show Spoiler

A nun rings a bell while people shout shame

If it weren’t so frightening to see digital harassment turn into assassinations, this might have been a funny story someday.

Like consider the absurdity of telling someone who isn’t online that Ali Hazelwood, a world-famous bestselling author, nuked her entire Instagram because people were digitally abusing her over a joke comment she made on an author panel about Peeta, a 2008 character who isn’t real. And because Instagram’s UX sucks, don’t forget that part.

So, yeah, critique hasn’t softened. It’s retreated. Places to express a critical opinion are becoming fewer and more private, and to express a critical opinion is to invite a world of hurt.

Y’all. It’s a book character. Please calm down. You’re ruining things.

Show Spoiler

A guy in a suit says Reading seldom leads to bad behavior

Apparently it does?

Can you just not?

[syndicated profile] eff_feed

Posted by Jillian C. York

For the third time since October 2023, Gaza has faced a near-total telecommunications blackout—plunging over 2 million residents into digital darkness and isolating them from the outside world. According to Palestinian digital rights organization 7amleh, the latest outage began on June 11, 2025, and lasted three days before partial service was restored on June 14. As of today, reports from inside Gaza suggest that access has been cut off again in central and southern Gaza. 

Blackouts like these affect internet and phone communications across Gaza, leaving journalists, emergency responders, and civilians unable to communicate, document, or call for help.

Cutting off telecommunications during an active military campaign is not only a violation of basic human rights—it is a direct attack on the ability of civilians to survive, seek safety, and report abuses. Access to information and the ability to communicate are core to the exercise of freedom of expression, press freedom, and the right to life itself.

The threat of recurring outages looms large. Palestinian digital rights groups warn of a complete collapse of Gaza’s telecommunications infrastructure, which has already been weakened by years of blockade, lack of spare parts, and now sustained bombardment.

These blackouts systematically silence the people of Gaza amidst a humanitarian crisis. They prevent the documentation of war crimes, hide the extent of humanitarian crises, and obstruct the global community’s ability to witness and respond.

EFF has long maintained that governments and occupying powers must not disrupt internet or telecom access, especially during times of conflict. The blackout in Gaza is not just a local or regional issue—it’s a global human rights emergency.

As part of the campaign led by 7amleh to #ReconnectGaza, we call on all actors, including governments, telecommunications regulators, and civil society, to demand an end to telecommunications blackouts in Gaza and everywhere. Connectivity is a lifeline, not a luxury. 

[syndicated profile] captainawkward_feed

Posted by JenniferP

I’ve been on hiatus to deal with some health issues and focus on book revisions due at the end of July, but I miss you all and this seems like a good way to at least visit. Let’s engage in the periodic ritual of using the search strings people typed into find this place as if they are questions. No context, all guesswork, assumptions, and snap judgments.

Here is a melancholy song with “May” in the lyrics. Sorry/you’re welcome for the earworm.

1 “Wanna clear the air on how a girl sees us.”

The most searched-for term is still “how to answer what are you looking for in a relationship” because people are still playing the game of trying to guess  what their dates want to hear and tailor their answers accordingly, like it’s a job interview. Could we possibly break this habit?

Before you talk to this girl, get clarity about your own wants and plans. How do you see her/the relationship? Is there an “us”? Do you want there to be? Starting from right now, in a perfect world, where you have this conversation and then everything works out exactly as you hope, what does your future relationship or level of interaction with this girl look like? What, specifically, is making you feel like the air needs clearing? And why now?

Is this air-clearing talk about getting closer or about creating more distance between you?

My advice is, figure out what you want and how you feel, own your decisions, and then level with her. “I feel…” “I hope….” “Going forward, I want…”

Don’t try to sell her on agreeing that what’s best for you is the same as what’s best for her. And don’t try to draw out all her vulnerabilities before revealing any of yours, especially if this is a “we need space” conversation. Instead, be honest and forthright and give her enough information about what you want so she can decide what’s best for her.

2  “How to motivate boyfriend to take his career seriously.”

You can’t, and even if you could, you shouldn’t.

Transforming a relatively unambitious person into an ambitious one is only possible if all the people in this sentence are you. You can be as ambitious, serious, and focused as you decide to be about your own career. If you decide what you really need is a partner who matches your ambitions and career focus, then you should probably go find someone who is already more compatible.

Either way, let go of the idea that it’s your job to fix or motivate your partner to be other than what he is, and especially let go of the notion that you can influence him without his consent and active participation. Treating a fellow adult like a rehabilitation project is a recipe for misery, and it’s hard to respect someone as an equal while you’re simultaneously trying to gentle parent them into being who you really want.

Either accept your boyfriend for who he is and what he already brings to the table now, or set him free to pursue his own happiness in his own sweet time.

3 “Friend got me a nice birthday gift but I didn’t get anything for their birthday last month awkward.”

Good news: Your friend knew and accepted that you didn’t get them anything and wanted to get you something anyway. Not everyone keeps score about that stuff the same way. Your job now is to say “thank you” and enjoy the gift to the fullest. There’s nothing to apologize for or fix about what’s happened so far, though your awkward feelings might help you re-evaluate how you want to handle things going forward.

Is this an important friendship that you want to nurture? Make a note in your calendar of when their birthday is and resolve to get them a present next year. Or treat them next time you go out. “I have an extra ticket to [neat thing], be my plus one?” Or talk to them and hash out how you want things to be from now on. “I loved your present but felt bad I didn’t get you anything. Next year should we plan to swap gifts, or maybe treat ourselves to a night out since our birthdays are so close together?” Only suggest things you’d be happy to do, not things that make more chores or obligations.

If this is someone you’d rather not be on gift-giving terms with, don’t fret. Say a polite thank you for the gift now, and then keep right on not getting them a birthday gift next year.

4 “Just found out high school best friend’s mom died six months ago what to say after all this time.”

A very close family friend died this spring, and we’ve had news of several other premature and awful deaths of people we’re connected to, so this topic has been on my mind more than usual.

The best time to say something to your grieving friend is right now and the worst thing to say is nothing.

As for what to say and how to say it from a distance, death is a circumstance where postal mail comes in incredibly handy. They make greeting cards just for this, and you can write your friend a short note expressing your sympathy inside. Sample structure for the note:

“Dear friend,

I just heard about your mom, and I’m so sorry.

I still remember [how she made us pose for prom photos][ how she made us walk up and down with books on our heads to help our posture][her amazing homemade birthday cakes and bespoke Halloween costumes][her giant laugh][this very cool and useful piece of advice she once gave me][her flawless fashion sense][how kind she was to let me shadow her at her job when I had to do a presentation for Career Day][how proud she was of you at graduation][how much you loved it/hated it whenever she sent you recipes and coupons she clipped in the mail all through college][how much you always looked forward to your visits back home with her][the stories you told about her].

This note is just to say that I’m thinking of you. If you want to reach me for any reason, my current info is _____________.

With all my sympathy,

Your name

Do: Keep it focused on your friend and their mom. If you interacted with her mom, try to come up with one true memory of her like the samples in the brackets, and if you didn’t meet her, try to come up with one true thing your friend told you about her or their relationship. If you can’t say something positive you could let the greeting card industry do its “in sympathy” work for you and remember that losing a shitty caregiver is still a loss worthy of acknowledgement. There’s no pithy, perfect, idealized thing you could say that would un-complicate this for your friend, but “I’m so sorry” and “I’m thinking of you” are classics for a reason.

Do not: Say gross stuff about how the dead person is “in a better place now.” Overdo apologizing for not being in touch sooner or comment on the closeness/lack of closeness in your friendship. Marvel aloud at how long it took you to find out, especially not to guilt trip your friend about not informing you personally amid everything else they had to deal with. Make generic offers of support you have no intention of following through with. Pry into what happened. Take this opportunity to catch your friend up on all your neat life events. Make big promises about staying more in touch or getting together in the future. Expect an immediate (or any) reply.

If you weren’t actively in each other’s lives enough to learn about the death at the time it happened, then take it as a given that everybody missed some stuff about each other in the interim and that catching up can be its own entirely separate conversation.The ball’s in your friend’s court.

Doing it this way gives you the benefit of a familiar, established, recognizable structure for expressing condolences, forces brevity, and removes pressure from your friend to have to react a certain way or do anything about it. I’m not in the pay of Big Greeting Card, and I don’t know your friend, so if another communication medium works better for you, please use that. I mostly just want to help break the impasse and avoid the horrible, forced, calcified silence that so often comes after after the funeral when bereaved people and not-immediately bereaved people start to mirror each other’s internal monologues in the worst possible way:

Not-directly bereaved person: Oh nooooooo, if I don’t say something I will feel like a callous jerk, but if I bring up the loss after all this time I will remind them of their loss, put them on the spot, and make them have to talk about feelings and death, and then I will feel like an even bigger jerk. Howabout this:  They can bring it up if they are comfortable doing so, but I won’t bring it up if they don’t.

Bereaved person: Oh noooooooo, if I mention death (a thing that requires no reminders when it happens near you), then I’ll make it weird and bring the whole vibe down. Nobody understands or cares about grieving people for very long, and that’s why  I must hold my shit together and pretend everything is fine so I don’t make people uncomfortable..

It’s understandable to want to avoid having to perform grief or forcing someone else to perform grief, but when the “safest” course defaults to “never ever bring up or talk about grief, in case it’s awkward somehow” the end result is grieving people feeling ever more isolated.

Fuck that! Mostly I think the worst thing you can say to a grieving person is nothing. Death is awkward and there is no smooth etiquette move that cancels out the crater that’s left whenever an irreplaceable being departs from the world. Nobody’s forcing anyone to talk anything, merely inviting. So my vote is to acknowledge the loss, some way, somehow and trust that if you accidentally mess up the grieving person will steer you in the right direction. “Thanks but I’d rather not discuss it here/right now/with you.” => You can rescue the situation by saying “Of course” and then helping them change the subject. “Yeah, I would like to talk about it very much, thanks for asking.” => You can ask questions like “What was ____ like?” and then listen to the answers without judgment.

5 “I love my boyfriend and my parents don’t like him what will I do?” 

The best course is going to be highly context dependent (are you an adult, do you actually need their permission, will it fuck up your access to housing and education if they decide to play dirty, are there some legit red flags or worries here), but here are some options for *a* course of action that gives you some agency over the situation.

1. Ask your parents, one time, to share their concerns and detail their objections and commit to hearing them out. Don’t defend him or argue in the moment, even if their objections are crap. You’re not going to change their minds right now, everybody is just going to double down on their original position, and getting “emotional” or signaling noncompliance will likely be held against you. Your best bet is to listen calmly without interrupting, take notes, and promise to think about what they said. (You will think about it even if you do nothing about it, so this isn’t technically a lie.)

2. Process the substance of their objections (if any), preferably with a trusted person or people that aren’t your boyfriend. Look for patterns and themes, such as:

  • Are the objections about this specific boyfriend or do they not want you to have any boyfriend at all without their permission? Is this more about objecting to him or is it about controlling you? The second thing sounds a lot like “You’re just too young, you need to focus on your studies, this is a distraction, what if you get pregnant, my house/my rules.” Controlling parents tend to be controlling about more than one thing, so if this is what’s happening it should be pretty obvious.
  • If the objections are about him, are they mostly about behaviors they’ve observed or are they mostly about demographics (age, race, class & family background, money, gender, politics, religion) or physical characteristics (clothes, hair, body modifications)? Compare these sample scripts:

“He’s from a poor family and has too many tattoos and doesn’t go to our church, we want you to hold out for someone better (where better = more like us)” is not really a statement about whether he’s a good person or a good partner for you. If he treats you well and makes you happy, your happiness  over time will be the ultimate evidence of whether this guy is the right partner for you. In the meantime, remind your parents that you did them the courtesy of hearing them out and now that they’ve said their piece you expect them to be courteous if they expect your attendance at family functions.

“I’ve noticed how he interrupts and talks over you, and how quiet you are/how on edge you seem whenever he’s around. He sometimes makes mean digs about your smarts or appearance, or says rude things about other people’s bodies, and while he and you insist he’s only joking, I never see you laughing. Plus, since you started dating him you’ve stopped spending time with your friends or doing things you love, and even when you try to hang out without him you’re distracted by his constant texts and keeping tabs on you the whole time. He moved the relationship along very quickly and doesn’t seem to have any friends of his own or interests besides you. I can get why that feels romantic and like you’re meant for each other, but it’s healthy for couples to have their own interests and support systems.” If your parents’ concerns sound like that, I hate to break it to you, but these are all indicators for coercive control, and your parents might be legitimately trying to protect you.

If that’s the case, what does your gut say? Do your closest and most trusted friends echo your parents’ concerns? Have you ever found yourself minimizing or hiding stuff your boyfriend does or says to you because you know your friends and parents will object on your behalf? If all the people you trust to like you hate him, that’s not a green flag. For more info, here’s an expert opinion/resource that might help.

6 “How to set boundaries with needy people.”

When you’re talking about needy people, plural, it immediately suggests a pattern or multiple patterns of repeated asks where you feel pressured to give more than you’re willing to give and where you struggle to maintain consistency.

The first time you break an established pattern is usually the hardest, but once you do it new patterns become possible.The most important step isn’t finding the right words to persuade the other people to give you what you need, it’s setting boundaries with yourself to ensure your needs are met.You can’t control what other people need or when they seek you out, but you can decide what you’re willing to tolerate and control how you respond. In order to break the pattern, said response can involve words (mostly “no”) but must be backed up by actions.

For example: If a friend or relative constantly asks to borrow money, and you keep giving them the money, that establishes a pattern where it’s not unreasonable for them to assume that you’ll keep bailing them out. Even if you say words like “I hate when you ask me to borrow money” or “Please stop expecting me to bail you out” or “But this really, truly has to be the last time” or “I really can’t afford to keep giving you money like this without jeopardizing my own situation, please stop asking” but you keep giving them money, it reveals a pattern where they can expect you to hem and haw about it a bit before you give them money, but you’ll still come through. Anyone who has ever worked in fundraising knows that it’s easier to get people who have already donated to give again than to convert someone who has never donated before.

Should people believe the “soft” nos and stop asking the first time they get one? Yes, obviously. But whenever whatever should be happening doesn’t match up with what is happening, we gotta deal with what’s true. To break the pattern, you have to say “No, I can’t help you this time” and then not give them money, no matter how many times they ask, no matter how disappointed they are, and no matter what they say to try to manipulate you or how uncomfortable it gets. Their need will be whatever it is. Your consent belongs to you, and their needs don’t override that.

Nobody who has a hard time saying no got that way overnight, and undoing the habit of putting other people’s needs over your own safety, comfort, and pleasure does not disappear overnight either. Unlearning these habits are a process that can take tons of time and trial and error. Disappointing people is a skill. Skills can be learned. It might never feel good or easy, but abdicating your own needs doesn’t feel good either. Sometimes there’s no way to meet everyone’s needs at the same time, but that doesn’t mean that yours always come last.

I could (and have) write a million more words about boundaries, but this is where I want to leave off for now: The first time you break an established pattern of compliance and back it up with action, you reveal a possible world where nobody is allowed to override your consent. The more you live in that world, the more you make it real.

[syndicated profile] eff_feed

Posted by Thorin Klosowski

With this week’s release of Android 16, Google added a new security feature to Android, called Advanced Protection. At-risk people—like journalists, activists, or politicians—should consider turning on. Here’s what it does, and how to decide if it’s a good fit for your security needs.

To get some confusing naming schemes clarified at the start: Advanced Protection is an extension of Google’s Advanced Protection Program, which protects your Google account from phishing and harmful downloads, and is not to be confused with Apple’s Advanced Data Protection, which enables end-to-end encryption for most data in iCloud. Instead, Google's Advanced Protection is more comparable to the iPhone’s Lockdown Mode, Apple’s solution to protecting high risk people from specific types of digital threats on Apple devices.

Advanced Protection for Android is meant to provide stronger security by: enabling certain features that aren’t on by default, disabling the ability to turn off features that are enabled by default, and adding new security features. Put together, this suite of features is designed to isolate data where possible, and reduce the chances of interacting with unsecure websites and unknown individuals.

For example, when it comes to enabling existing features, Advanced Protection turns on Android’s “theft detection” features (designed to protect against in-person thefts), forces Chrome to use HTTPS for all website connections (a feature we’d like to see expand to everything on the phone), enables scam and spam protection features in Google Messages, and disables 2G (which helps prevent your phone from connecting to some Cell Site Simulators). You could go in and enable each of these individually in the Settings app, but having everything turned on with one tap is much easier to do.

Advanced Protection also prevents you from disabling certain core security features that are enabled by default, like Google Play Protect (Android’s built-in malware protection) and Android Safe Browsing (which safeguards against malicious websites).

But Advanced Protection also adds some new features. Once turned on, the “Inactivity reboot” feature restarts your device if it’s locked for 72 hours, which prevents ease of access that can occur when your device is on for a while and you have settings that could unlock your device. By forcing a reboot, it resets everything to being encrypted and behind biometric or pin access. It also turns on “USB Protection,” which makes it so any new USB connection can only be used for charging when the device is locked. It also prevents your device from auto-reconnecting to unsecured Wi-Fi networks.

As with all things Android, some of these features are limited to select devices, or only phones made by certain manufacturers. Memory Tagging Extension (MTE), which attempts to mitigate memory vulnerabilities by blocking unauthorized access, debuted on Pixel 8 devices in 2023 is only now showing up on other phones. These segmentations in features makes it a little difficult to know exactly what your device is protecting against if you’re not using a Pixel phone.

Some of the new features, like the ability to generate security logs that you can then share with security professionals in case your device is ever compromised, along with the aforementioned insecure network reconnect and USB protection features, won’t launch until later this year.

It’s also worth considering that enabling Advanced Protection may impact how you use your device. For example, Advanced Protection disables the JavaScript optimizer in Chrome, which may break some websites, and since Advanced Protection blocks unknown apps, you won’t be able to side-load. There’s also the chance that some of the call screening and scam detection features may misfire and flag legitimate calls.

How to Turn on Advanced Protection

screenshots of Android's Advanced Protection page

Advanced Protection is easy to turn on and off, so there’s no harm in giving it a try. Advanced Protection was introduced with Android 16, so you may need to update your phone, or wait a little longer for your device manufacturer to support the update if it doesn’t already. Once you’re updated, to turn it on:

  • Open the Settings app.
  • Tap Security and Privacy > Advanced Protection, and enable the option next to “Device Protection.” 
  • If you haven’t already done so, now is a good time to consider enabling Advanced Protection for your Google account as well, though you will need to enroll a security key or a passkey to use this feature.

We welcome these features on Android, as well as the simplicity of its approach to enabling several pre-existing security and privacy features all at once. While there is no panacea for every security threat, this is a baseline that improves the security on Android for at-risk individuals without drastically altering day-to-day use, which is a win for everyone. We hope to see Google continue to push new improvements to this feature and for different phone manufacturer’s to support Advanced Protection where they don’t already.

[syndicated profile] eff_feed

Posted by Hannah Zhao

This post was written by EFF legal intern Alexa Chavara.

Black box technology has no place in the criminal legal system. That’s why we’ve once again filed an amicus brief arguing that the both the defendant and the public have a right to information regarding face recognition technology (FRT) that was used during an investigation to identify a criminal defendant.

Back in June 2023, we filed an amicus brief along with Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) and the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) in State of New Jersey v. Arteaga. We argued that information regarding the face recognition technology used to identify the defendant should be disclosed due to the fraught process of a face recognition search and the many ways that inaccuracies manifest in the use of the technology. The New Jersey appellate court agreed, holding that state prosecutors must turn over detailed information to the defendant about the FRT used, including how it works, its source code, and its error rate. The court held that this ensures the defendant’s due process rights with the ability to examine the information, scrutinize its reliability, and build a defense.

Last month, partnering with the same organizations, we filed another amicus brief in favor of transparency regarding FRT in the criminal system, this time in the New Jersey Supreme Court in State of New Jersey v. Miles.

In Miles, New Jersey law enforcement used FRT to identify Mr. Miles as a suspect in a criminal investigation. The defendant, represented by the same public defender in Arteaga, moved for discovery on information about the FRT used, relying on Arteaga. The trial court granted this request for discovery, and the appellate court affirmed. The State then appealed to the New Jersey Supreme Court, where the issue is before the Court for the first time.

As explained in our amicus brief, disclosure is necessary to ensure criminal prosecutions are based on accurate evidence. Every search using face recognition technology presents a unique risk of error depending on various factors from the specific FRT system used, the databases searched, the quality of the photograph, and the demographics of the individual. Study after study shows that facial recognition algorithms are not always reliable, and that error rates spike significantly when involving faces of people of color,  especially Black women, as well as trans and nonbinary people.

Moreover, these searches often determine the course of investigation, reinforcing errors and resulting in numerous wrongful arrests, most often of Black folks. Discovery is the last chance to correct harm from misidentification and to allow the defendant to understand the evidence against them.

Furthermore, the public, including independent experts, have the right to examine the technology used in criminal proceedings. Under the First Amendment and the more expansive New Jersey Constitution corollary, the public’s right to access criminal judicial proceedings includes filings in pretrial proceedings, like the information being sought here. That access provides the public meaningful oversight of the criminal justice system and increases confidence in judicial outcomes, which is especially significant considering the documented risks and shortcomings of FRT.

[syndicated profile] notalwaysworking_feed

Posted by Not Always Right

Read Not In Receipt Of A Helpful Attitude

Me: "I just went through the drive-through, and I'm missing [Item]."
Cashier: "I'm sorry to hear that. Do you have a receipt?"
Me: "I asked for one, but I was told that the printer was out of paper."
Cashier: "Unfortunately, without a receipt, there's nothing I can do for you."

Read Not In Receipt Of A Helpful Attitude

[syndicated profile] askamanager_feed

Posted by Ask a Manager

It’s a special “where are you now?” season at Ask a Manager and I’m running updates from people who had their letters here answered in the past.

Remember the letter-writer who worried they were the weakest link on their team? The first update was here, and here’s the latest.

I wrote to you last year about how unhappy I was to be the lowest performing person on my team. My job was killing my confidence and was making me miserable. I’m happy to report that things are very different now!

In December of 2024, I was notified that I was being laid off. I was given a month of employment to wrap up and a generous severance. It was honestly a blessing because it was like getting paid full-time to work on getting a better job. Before launching my job search in earnest, I spent a month improving my skills. I read books about best practices, worked on a side project, and even hired someone to mentor me. What a difference a little professional development made! I finally understood concepts that had always been fuzzy. I finally started to feel competent. In the new year, I took this confidence and started applying for jobs in my target area. I got some responses and was given technical assessments. Thanks in large part to the skilling-up I had done, I aced these, and was invited to move forward in the interview process for two roles. By January 16th, I had an offer! I took the job and even negotiated a higher salary.

In my new role, I was actually hired to be the resident expert in my background area. If you had told me that last October, I would have panicked and said that I couldn’t succeed in that. But here I am, doing fine! I’m not only following along successfully, I’m driving design and taking responsibility for a major piece of our project. My co-workers ask for my help with things they can’t solve and value my feedback on my their work.

I’ve tried to figure out what’s responsible for things going so differently. I think it helps that my new co-workers expect me to succeed. In my old role, no one had any confidence in me. But now people rely on my judgment and look to me as an example. That propels me to put forth the best work I can. I used to just try to get by, because that’s all I thought I was capable of. But now I always make sure I’m following best practices, because I’m setting the standard for the rest of my team.

It also helps that I’m now working in a new area that’s very well documented. There are whole books I can go to for guidance, whereas my old project was so proprietary that there was nowhere to go for help outside of my immediate coworkers. Whenever I’m figuring something out now, I can research it and make an informed decision. I’ve become much more skilled in the few months I’ve been working here because of all the reading I’ve done to support my work.

My job is not perfect, and I still have some of the same weaknesses I did in my old role. But overall it’s a world of difference. I feel like I’m a different person. If anyone reading this is unhappy in their job but afraid of looking for a new one, I hope you are lucky enough to be laid off like I was :)

The post update: I’m the weakest link on my team appeared first on Ask a Manager.

LJ Idol Prompt #1: Quality

16 Jun 2025 03:14 pm
used_songs: (dog love)
[personal profile] used_songs
Yesterday I sat on the couch next to you because you were in a rare mood for cuddling. You turned your little head and looked at me with your big, blank, brown eyes. Same dark lashes. Same black mask, just shading white around your mouth. Same soft wrinkles. But your eyes. Flat and expressionless, and liquid and curved, and alive and endless.

If I stare deeply enough, I can see them. The tiny pyramids that are also on the back of the paper money. A camera lens watching me. The triangles are far back in your eyes, deep in the black pupils, shadowy like storm clouds. But they are there. I think it’s possible that is what reflects my flashlight when we go outside early in the morning.

Maybe not.

Yesterday I sat and stared into your eyes, beautiful girl, and the cameras were watching me back. Someone sitting in a room full of 90s office furniture, squeaky chair, framed certificates and ballpoint pens, heavy plastic monitor next to a landline, was staring at me. I could feel them, feel the weight of their intensity. What are they watching for? When you stare at me in order to make me give you a treat, what do they see?

I don’t care if you’re a spy. I love you.

I have given you salmon oil in your high quality kibble, boiled chicken and white rice, pumpkin puree, an assortment of healthy fruits and vegetables, washed your feet, wiped your face with coconut oil, loved every one of your rolls, kissed your soft head, dusted beige probiotic powders over your food, bought you a thousand dollars worth of toys to destroy, comforted you over every trimmed nail. I don’t care who you work for. I don’t care if you are real.

I don’t care if you are spying on me. You have brought 346 sticks into the house that I have had to take away before you chew them up and eat them. I have pulled threads of grass out of your butt when you panicked and ran, tucked up like a round ball. I pick up your shit.

Yesterday you turned your little head and you looked at me and you yawned, white teeth, pink tongue, the elegant ruga along the sides of your lips, the black spot across the ridges of your hard palate, the dark tube of your throat. You leaned in and I could feel your breath against my face. I leaned in. Your fur is soft, you smell like sunshine and sticks and dried mud. You have tiny brown hairs, the most perfect brown that has ever been.

Yesterday I thought about the other dogs, the ones who already lived and are sealed in caskets upstairs, always with me. Did they have spy cameras, robotic intelligences like you? Were they cameras? Did they each have their own bureaucrat, sitting in an uncomfortable chair and watching? Or are you special?

Am I the eyes looking back at me, looking up while looking down? Are you me? I wait impatiently, as you refill the blue bowl with clean water from the tap. But I prefer the hose outside and maybe I will tell you I need to go out just to drink that water. Press my nose to the door until you open it and then make an immediate right to the spigot. I wait impatiently by my yellow bowl, as you use the big spoon to measure out chicken, to mix in the powder, to add chicken broth. You set it down. I am excited. You set it down. I dance. You set it down. I am so hungry!

Yesterday I looked through the eyes and I saw a cascade of water, the smallest insects, the fallen sticks, the edges of the cut grass, the metal strip at the bottom of the door. But, of course, the equipment isn’t built to transmit the smells and tastes or even how it feels to be alive. I can see and I can hear, but that’s all. I lean back in my chair and it squeaks.

I lean down, smiling, “That’s all, mama. That’s all.” Straighten. “Go take a nap while I wash your bowl, sweet girl.” I turn back to the sink, the counter tops cool beneath bent fingers.

You know there are robotic dogs, now, that have simple AI, that can make a few decisions, that can rebalance themselves like animals that are kicked, that can trot and climb and accompany people. Is that who is in the pyramids, not an outside watcher, but an inside one? Who is inside you? When I touch the little remolino on your hip, you feel warm and real. When I look across the table and you pick up your head from your loose sprawl in the exact center of the kitchen floor, in the way of everyone and every cabinet door and the oven and the refrigerator.

Yesterday on the hammock you rolled over and covered my feet, but you were watching the squirrels and maybe you didn’t notice. I’m shredding your chicken and you are drooling on the floor. The mockingbirds are eating the chiltepins off that bush that sprang up in the yard, the one you chewed up last winter and I thought you had killed it but I didn’t care.

Yesterday the squirrels climbed the greased pole to get to the bird feeder. Their flicking tails made you angry. You told them. You ate a fly.

Pyramids are where queens lie, that’s where the treasure is. If it comes to it, if I have to entomb you in the dark box, think of me like a sacrifice, a portrait painted on the walls to accompany you.

Beautiful dog, beautiful girl, the most perfect brown dog ever, your beautiful eyes, your dark lashes, your soft face, the dark bars across your toes, your wrinkles, your beautiful rolls, perfect, perfect, perfect. Watch me like I watch you. Wonder about me like I wonder about you. The mystery of a person who is not human, who looks at me and wonders. I know your dark eyes are wondering. The little alien on four legs that is sitting on my couch as I type this. The little alien who dozes when Alexa plays Philip Glass, the person who plays with her sweet potatoes and her plushes, who is not allowed upstairs but sometimes goes there.

It’s stupid to talk about yesterday and tomorrow when we live in the infinite now. I sit on the couch next to you because you are in a mood for cuddling. You turn your little head and look at me with your big, blank, brown eyes, alive and endless. You turn your big head toward me and look with brown eyes, too.

[ SECRET POST #6737 ]

16 Jun 2025 04:01 pm
case: (Default)
[personal profile] case posting in [community profile] fandomsecrets

⌈ Secret Post #6737 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.


More! )


Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 32 secrets from Secret Submission Post #964.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Inca Trail: Day 1

16 Jun 2025 08:07 pm
purplecat: The family on top of Pen Y Fan (General:Walking)
[personal profile] purplecat
We did our Inca Trail holiday with Explore! who (out of necessity as I understand it) subcontracted to a local tour company. At some point something went wrong with getting permits for the trail. The story we were told was that the local agent forgot to apply for our permits, but several other people in the group had had permits delayed, so we concluded that there had been a more general permit mix-up which was simplified for our consumption as "forgot to apply for your permits". The up-shot of all this was that instead of travelling as part of a group of ten walkers with a guide, cook and porters it was just the two of us with a guide, cook and porters, setting out a day after everyone else with the aim of catching up with them at Machu Picchu. This was a mixed blessing, we got a lot more time with our guide and didn't have to worry that we were slowing anyone down, on the other hand it felt like an awful lot of staff for just us and even though our guide as very good at leaving us alone for various stretches, or sending us off on our own to explore things, it was quite intense.

Photos and more under the cut! )

Chat corner: Free-for-all

16 Jun 2025 09:33 pm
annathecrow: screenshot from Star Wars: The Phantom Menace. A detail of the racing pod engines. (sw: pods)
[personal profile] annathecrow posting in [community profile] dreamwars

Welcome to your weekly free-for-all chat post. Anything SW-related is fair game.

Have fun!

A certain chuffedness

16 Jun 2025 07:55 pm
oursin: hedgehog wearing a yellow flower (Hedgehog with flower)
[personal profile] oursin

I cannot help myself feeling a certain gratification when a reviews editor calls the reviews I have just submitted 'beautifully written' and is eager to solicit further (though as I have several others in hand, may not take this up very urgently....) (Preen, preen.)

Have also been solicited quite out of the blue to take part in a podcast. WOT.

It is also very pleasing that the return of Lady Bexbury and her extensive circle is appreciated.

***

Not so very long ago I posted about this lady who worked for SOE way back when: and now Blaise Metreweli named as first woman to lead UK intelligence service MI6.

I thought The secret lives of MI6’s top female spies this was connected - it's actually 2022 but maybe being reposted for the new association. There are several paragraphs of aged former secret agent lady waxing snarky about the sexism aforetimes that precluded advancement up the ranks.

Beneath her tales of life in the service there is real anger about the way women were treated. Both she and her great friend, Daphne Park — a fellow senior SIS officer who died in 2010 at the age of 88 — led distinguished careers but failed to reach the highest ranks. This, they suspected, was due to their gender.
Ramsay speaks in a soft Scots burr which rises audibly when I ask about SIS’s record on female officers. She feels particularly aggrieved that Park, a life-long intelligence officer who held SIS postings in Moscow, Lusaka, Hanoi and Ulan Bator, did not progress to the most senior levels. (MI6 would neither confirm nor deny it had employed Park.) “There’s no doubt in my mind that Daphne should have been at least one rung up as the deputy chief position. I can say that without any equivocation,” Ramsay says, tapping a lacquered pink fingernail on the table. Park, described unkindly in one obituary as looking “more like Miss Marple than Mata Hari”, resigned early from the service in 1979, having told a friend that she would never be promoted to SIS chief because of her gender.
By the early 1990s, Ramsay was rumoured to be in the running for the post of C, although shortlists are never publicly acknowledged. Privately, she thought the promotion of a woman to that role would still be “quite impossible”.... She observes that while many talented women such as Noor Inayat Khan excelled in the Special Operations Executive, a wartime secret service and sabotage unit set up in 1940, there was a long period afterwards when women ceased to be employed as intelligence officers at all. Ramsay recounts an episode in the 1970s when she came across a woman she thought would make a “perfect” agent-runner. She telephoned the head of recruitment to discuss the prospect, who told her they weren’t looking for women. “He said, ‘It would take an extraordinary gel’ — and it was the ‘gel’ that got to me — ‘to be an intelligence officer’. And I said, ‘Well, it would take an extraordinary boy too, but it hasn’t stopped you recruiting males!’”

Things Coming Out Next

16 Jun 2025 01:49 pm
marthawells: (Witch King)
[personal profile] marthawells
Storyteller: A Tanith Lee Tribute Anthology

Out in ebook and paperback on July 1. My story is "Data Ghost"

https://bookshop.org/p/books/storyteller-a-tanith-lee-tribute-anthology/a74b320486117220?ean=9798992595406&next=t

https://www.kobo.com/us/en/ebook/storyteller-a-tanith-lee-tribute-anthology?sId=e0bafab6-32a8-4ffb-9436-2dcda473349c

Edited by Julie C. Day, Carina Bissett, and Craig Laurance Gidney. Stories by Martha Wells, Andy Duncan, C.S.E. Cooney, Nisi Shawl, Mike Allen, Alaya Dawn Johnson, CL Hellisen, Maya Deane, Rocío Rincón Fernández, Theodora Goss, Getty Hesse, Starlene Justice, Amelia Mangan, Michael Yuya Montroy, Marisca Pichette, KT Wagner.

Sixteen new stories from some of today's most renowned authors. All inspired by the master storyteller Tanith Lee.

Drowning cities and unicorns. Burning deserts and forgotten gods. Golems, elf warriors, and inner-Earthers. Alien lifeforms and museum workers. Ancient plagues and the future of humanity. The familiar and the fantastical. Each story in this anthology is both unique and compelling: from fairy-tale retellings to romance-tinged high fantasy, from nihilistic horror to gripping science fiction. Immersive, wide-ranging, and sublime, Storyteller features worlds and characters that are sure to travel with you long after the last page has been read.



***


Short Story: "Rapport: Friendship, Solidarity, Communion, Empathy" by Martha Wells

will be available on Reactor Magazine on July 10

Illustrated by Jaime Jones
Edited by Lee Harris

Perihelion and its crew embark on a dangerous new mission at a corporate-controlled station in the throes of a hostile takeover...


***


Summer of Science Fiction & Fantasy: Martha Wells in conversation with Kate Elliott

https://www.clarionwest.org/event/summer-of-science-fiction-fantasy-martha-wells-in-conversation-with-kate-elliott/


July 30 @ 6:00 pm – 7:30 pm PDT

The Clarion West Summer Reading Series will be held virtually and streamed live over Zoom during the Six-Week Workshop.

Join us for our final event, a conversation between Martha Wells and Kate Elliott!

This event will begin with a conversation between Martha and Kate. There will be time to take questions from the audience. Participants will be able to submit questions in the webinar.



***


The New Yorker announced "Platform Decay" will be the next Murderbot novella. No word on publication date yet.


***


Grimoire: A Grim Oak Press Anthology For Seattle Worldcon 2025

https://grimoakpress.com/products/grimoire-a-grim-oak-press-anthology-for-seattle-worldcon-2025

My story is a fantasy called "Birthright" which is reprint that's not currently available anywhere else.


***


Queen Demon, the sequel to Witch King, second book of the Rising World, is up for preorder and will be released in ebook, audiobook, and hardcover on October 7.

From the breakout SFF superstar author of Murderbot comes the remarkable sequel to the USA Today and Sunday Times bestselling novel, Witch King. A fantasy of epic scope, Queen Demon is a story of power and friendship, of trust and betrayal, and of the families we choose.

Dahin believes he has clues to the location of the Hierarchs' Well, and the Witch King Kai, along with his companions Ziede and Tahren, knowing there's something he isn't telling them, travel with him to the rebuilt university of Ancartre, which may be dangerously close to finding the Well itself.

Can Kai stop the rise of a new Hierarch?

And can he trust his companions to do what's right?


Bookshop.org https://bookshop.org/p/books/queen-demon-martha-wells/21751501?ean=9781250826916

B&N https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/queen-demon-martha-wells/1146167707?ean=9781250826916

Kobo https://www.kobo.com/us/en/ebook/queen-demon

Audiobook Libro.fm https://libro.fm/audiobooks/9781250291981-queen-demon

Bakka-Phoenix (indie bookstore in Canada): https://bakkaphoenixbooks.com/item/3Czr8TaWU9-_fwJ25ytSCw
[syndicated profile] eff_feed

Posted by Melissa Srago

Hacker Summer Camp is almost here... and with it comes the Third Annual EFF Benefit Poker Tournament at DEF CON 33 hosted by security expert Tarah Wheeler.

Please join us at the same place and time as last year: Friday, August 8th, at high noon at the Horseshoe Poker Room. The fees haven’t changed; it’s still $250 to register plus $100 the day of the tournament with unlimited rebuys. (AND all players will receive a complimentary EFF Titanium Level Membership for the year.)

Tarah Wheeler—EFF board member and resident poker expert—has been working hard on the tournament since last year! We will have Lintile as emcee this year and there's going to be bug bounties! When you take someone out of the tournament, they will give you a pin. Prizes—and major bragging rights—go to the player with the most bounty pins. Be sure to register today and see lintile in action!

Did we mention there will be Celebrity Bounties? Knock out Wendy Nather, Chris “WeldPond” Wysopal, Jake “MalwareJake” Williams, Bryson Bort, Allan Friedman and get neat EFF swag and the respect of your peers! Plus, as always, knock out Tarah's dad Mike, and she donates $250 to the EFF in your name!

EFF Benefit Poker Tournament at DC33
Horseshoe Poker Room
3645 Las Vegas Blvd Overpass, Las Vegas, NV 89109
Friday, August 8, 12:00 pm

Register Now

Find Full Event Details and Registration

Have a friend that might be interested but not sure how to play? Have you played some poker before but could use a refresher? Join poker pro Mike Wheeler (Tarah’s dad) and celebrities for a free poker clinic from 11:00 am-11:45 am just before the tournament. Mike will show you the rules, strategy, table behavior, and general Vegas slang at the poker table. Even if you know poker pretty well, come a bit early and help out.

Register today and reserve your deck. Be sure to invite your friends to join you!

 

[syndicated profile] notalwaysworking_feed

Posted by Not Always Right

Read That Work/Life Imbalance Can Go Either Way…

The last six months, my boyfriend has been working on a huge project, with a demanding client that is located several time zones away, resulting in late online meetings and calls almost every day. I also sometimes work a couple of hours in the evenings after our daughter has gone to bed, but not nearly as much.

Read That Work/Life Imbalance Can Go Either Way…

Profile

thedivinegoat: A photo of a yellow handled screwdriver, with text saying "This could be a little more sonic" (Default)
thedivinegoat

June 2022

M T W T F S S
  12345
678910 1112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

  • Style: Lairë for Ciel by nornoriel

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 17 Jun 2025 04:24 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios